W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [Selectors] Clarify when universal selector may be omitted

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:30:19 -0700
Message-ID: <4AE096AB.1050000@inkedblade.net>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Leif Halvard Silli On 09-10-22 02.23:
>> fantasai On 09-10-21 02.41:
>>
>>   
> 
>> * Simple selector sequences are made up of two kind of components:
>>   - simple selectors
>>   - pseudo elements
>> * 'Components of simple selectors' are not properly defined
>>   
> 
> Correction of the last sentence:
> 
> * 'Component of a sequence of simple selectors' is not properly defined

It's defined by combining the standard definition of "component"
from English with the definition of sequence of simple selectors
in the spec.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:30:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:21 GMT