- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:12:53 -0400
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 10/16/09 12:34 AM, Brad Kemper wrote: > Oh. I didn't realize that. Is that because "Only one pseudo-element may > appear per selector"? [1] It kind of looks more like two instances of > the same selector to me, but maybe I'm just splitting hairs. You're just wrong. ;) "selector" in this instance is in fact everything between a pair of commas. It's clearly defined in section 4 of the spec you cite, paragraph 1. > It seems like it would be a breeze to implement "::after::after", once you have > implemented single "::outside" support. (Not that I can write the code > myself or anything.) ::outside is not implemented in any UA to my knowledge. And ::after::after is not implemented not just due to the selector syntax restriction, but because the entire CSS3 generated content spec is more or less wishful thinking at this point. -Boris
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 18:18:27 UTC