W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [css3-selectors] LC issues #3

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:55:04 -0700
Message-ID: <4AD37B88.3070405@inkedblade.net>
To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Anton Prowse wrote:
> Congratulations on a very solid-looking specification!
> 
> Here are the things that I noticed when reading through the document.
> (Trivial editorial issues are listed separately at the end.)
> ...
> 6.6.4. The UI element states pseudo-classes
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#UIstates) :
> 
>   # Most elements will be neither :enabled nor :disabled.
> 
> Issue 3:  This sentence is meaningless for general document languages.

It's meant to clarify that e.g. paragraph text does not match either
:enabled or :disabled. Adjusted to

  # In a typical document most elements will be neither :enabled nor
  # :disabled."

but I don't think we should remove it.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 18:55:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:21 GMT