- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:00:21 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Nov 19, 2009, at 12:13 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > I've added > # The area outside the curve of the border edge does not accept > # mouse events on behalf of the element. > to the definition of 'border-radius' and > # [portions of the border-image outside the border box] are > # invisible to mouse events and do not capture such events on > # behalf of the element. > to the definition of 'border-image-outset'. Please let me know if > this is acceptable. That's understandable, and worded in such a way that it covers the combination of those two properties too. One question: were we set on using "do not" instead of "may not"? Could there, for instance, be a mobile device that is able to draw curves, but only capture renctangular areas fir mouse events (or touch events). Or would a UA be non-complient if it did register clicks on border-image pixels outside the border-box, based on the alpha mask?
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 21:01:10 UTC