W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2009

Re: [CSS21] text-decoration/visibility

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:45:12 -0800
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20091118054512.GB4624@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Thursday 2009-11-12 11:38 -0600, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote:
> > - As for decoration specified on a given element being ignored if the same
> > type (e.g. underline, line-through) is propagated from an ancestor, is that
> > what "cannot have any effect on the decoration of the ancestor" is meant to
> > say? If so, maybe it would be clearer if, say, "of" were to be replaced with
> > "propagated from".
> 
> Hmm, I assumed the reverse - that it simply wouldn't reach up and
> change the ancestor's decoration.  But your reading makes more sense.

My understanding of the model has always been that if both ancestor
and descendant specify text-decoration, you can get two
text-decorations drawn on top of each other (and, depending on font
metrics, the inner one may or may not cover up the outer).

The only concrete use case I can come up with for multiple nested
text-decorations of the same type is something like:

  :link, :visited { text-decoration: underline; }
  sup { text-decoration: underline; vertical-align: super; font-size: 0.7em; }

  <a href="...">en el 1<sup>o</sup> caso</a> [1]

in which I suspect this may be the desired behavior (assuming that
the author wasn't using the appropriate Unicode codepoint, which
they probably should be for this case, but perhaps not for other
less common cases).

-David

[1] see http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/1%C2%BA

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 05:45:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:22 GMT