W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2009

(unknown charset) Re: [CSS21] text-decoration/visibility

From: (unknown charset) Andrey Mikhalev <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:54:48 +0300 (MSK)
To: (unknown charset) Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
cc: (unknown charset) "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, √ėyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0911122147150.8233@master.abisoft.spb.ru>
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Boris Zbarsky wrote:

> The "wouldn't reach up" is correct.  That is, the ancestor draws the 
> decorations no matter what.  The child can draw its own decorations, but 
> can't make the ancestor's go away.

inadequate model.
child should draws all decorations, since "Relatively positioning a 
descendant moves all text decorations affecting it".
so, if i have invisible relative child, it will paint decorations
propagated from parent? weird...

> -Boris
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 18:55:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:30 UTC