W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2009

Re: [CSS21] text-decoration/visibility

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:21:47 -0600
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0911120921p7195da85ka26fb0faf9876d1f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrey Mikhalev <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Andrey Mikhalev
<amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
>> They treat it identically in standards mode (and correctly per spec, which
>> does fully specify this). In quirks mode, Opera's behavior doesn't change
>> while Firefox's does; there's a quirk that I can explain if desired.
>
> in standards mode behavior defined in E.2?
> "any underlining affecting the text of the element, in tree order of the
> elements applying the underlining"
>
> it's unclean for me why text-decoration from invisible ancestor not affected
> element:
> "The color(s) required for the text decoration must be derived from the
> 'color' property value of the element on which 'text-decoration' is set."
> nothing is said about ignoring this rule on visibility.
>
> quirk mode obvious.

I can't tell.  Are you asking Boris for details about the quirks-mode
behavior, or are you asking about the standards-mode behavior?

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 17:22:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:22 GMT