W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2009

Re: radial-gradient() proposal

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:34:44 -0800
Message-Id: <0C862DFF-E48C-4C22-92E3-2A96174F1EB0@gmail.com>
To: Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
It would if it were degrees of clockwise rotation, instead of just  
indicating a linear direction. There is nothing turning here, just an  
angle to indicate a straight direction. In geometry convention, 90  
degrees as a linear direction is straight up.



On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com> wrote:

> Wouldn't 90 degrees point straight down, since +y points down?
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 4, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 0deg being up (I think; the current proposal doesn't say),
>>
>> 0deg is left-to-right. Like on a protractor, where 0 points to the  
>> right,
>> 180 points to the left, and 90 points straight up.
>>
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2009 02:35:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:22 GMT