W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2009

Re: radial-gradient() proposal

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:14:01 -0800
Message-Id: <7E49038C-AF30-4BFB-B9D9-AD26626AC9B1@gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>


On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:07 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org 
> > wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't thought about radial-gradient yet, but I do see that the  
>>> current
>>> radial gradient proposal does not allow the author to place a radial
>>> gradient in an arbitrary spot that does not necessarily touch the  
>>> edges or
>>> corners of the box. I think this use case is important, for  
>>> example content
>>> that wants to put a gradient on the <body> that creates a glow  
>>> around some
>>> element on the page.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better design to put that glow somewhere associated  
>> with the
>> element it's highlighting?
>>
>> You can use background-position to offset a radial gradient, if you  
>> need to.
>
> One effect that Simon brought up in person that I think is valid is,
> frex, a glow on a heading where the glow extends slightly out into the
> top of the following content.  You can't do this as a background on
> the heading without some nasty negative-margin hacks.

What about with some ::before content?

>
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2009 02:14:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:22 GMT