Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)

Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> Sorry, I meant that the part of rule one about discarding the box (and
> its related out-of-flow box) is superflous. The inline box itself is
> needed.

Ah, ok.  Yeah, if we change the computed display for kids of 
table-columns and table-column-groups, then agreed.

-Boris