W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [Backgrounds/Borders] What to do when a border-image fails to load

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:43:18 -0700
Cc: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <01A2DAEC-9105-460A-A727-AA755F37DBC8@gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Brad Kemper  
> <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 5:01 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:50 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
>>>>> Sorry but border is not an outline either. E.g. outline does not
>>>>> participate in hits testing. But border does. How you border image
>>>>> solution will handle :hover state?
>>>> Those are good questions. I suppose for simplicity anything  
>>>> outside the
>>>> border-box would not participate in hit testing or hover testing.
>>> This would also be a very good argument for still combining
>>> border-radius with border-image; border-radius will clip the hit  
>>> box,
>>> which can be useful to match up with some border-image shapes.
>> For hit-testing, yes. For clipping, no. If I have to chose between
>>  hit-testing and not having my image clipped by the radius, then I  
>> prefer
>> the latter. Consider an images like these:
>> http://www.bradclicks.com/cssplay/border-image/borders.png
>> In each case, it would be useful to have border-radius for  
>> fallback, for
>> background-clipping, and for hit/hover-testing, but not for  
>> clipping the
>> border-image.
> Certainly; I did not mean to imply otherwise.

Actually, David Hyatt implied in a different thread a few days ago  
that hit-testing was based fairly strictly on clipping, so I was also  
incorporating that info into my reply to you, above. Maybe he could  
find a way to clip the hit/hover-testing without clipping the border  
though, as you and I would prefer.

> It should have a layout
> effect, as it does now,

Does it? I didn't think border-radius changed where anything is placed  
or how much room it takes up. Maybe that's not what you meant?

> but in and of itself be invisible, and have no
> effect on border-image (which already ignores all other layout
> concerns in your proposal).

Right. It would still clip the content (non-positioned descendants),  
for much the same reason it clips the background (because it is part  
of the border-box shape that contains the background and contents,  
while border-images create their own shapes).
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 15:45:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:25 UTC