On Mar 29, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: >> Should negative offsets be allowed for (b)? I don't see why not, >> but just thought I'd ask, since your proposal doesn't really say >> one way or the other. > > I did think about that too after I posted it. I think negative > offsets should be allowed, and could be useful for pushing the > border images further into the padding-box/content-box area. I don't > have any problem with that. By the way, the visual result of using negative offsets is that it would reveal whatever is behind the now invisible border-style border. Since that one is still staking up space, it would be similar to having a zero opacity border there, with the images of the image- border moved inward to reveal that fact. Its a little odd, but probably doesn't add much complexity at all to the rendering, so I don't see any reason to prevent it.Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 04:39:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:07 GMT