W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [Backgrounds/Borders] What to do when a border-image fails to load

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:39:08 -0700
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <551E22F7-B1D4-4BD1-877D-4E04280B50BF@gmail.com>
To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>

On Mar 29, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Brad Kemper wrote:

>> Should negative offsets be allowed for (b)?  I don't see why not,  
>> but just thought I'd ask, since your proposal doesn't really say  
>> one way or the other.
> I did think about that too after I posted it. I think negative  
> offsets should be allowed, and could be useful for pushing the  
> border images further into the padding-box/content-box area. I don't  
> have any problem with that.

By the way, the visual result of using negative offsets is that it  
would reveal whatever is behind the now invisible border-style border.  
Since that one is still staking up space, it would be similar to  
having a zero opacity border there, with the images of the image- 
border moved inward to reveal that fact. Its a little odd, but  
probably doesn't add much complexity at all to the rendering, so I  
don't see any reason to prevent it.
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 04:39:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:25 UTC