> I remember we decided it would be invalid and that Firefox would have to > be changed. Per this blog post I'm correct: > http://www.w3.org/blog/CSS/2009/03/10/resolutions_58 No wonder I was getting so confused. I was looking in the wrong places :) Thanks !Received on Friday, 27 March 2009 14:39:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:07 GMT