W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [css2.1] [css3-selectors] Re: [CSSWG] Minutes, 25 March 2009 telcon

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:53:24 +0100
Message-ID: <49CA6F94.8060404@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Zack Weinberg wrote:

> This makes :not() much clearer, but as David pointed out in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0195.html
> there is still a bug in both css 2.1 and css3-selectors, since
> the grammar does not allow a pseudo-element by itself as a valid
> selector, conflicting with implementations and possibly css1
> (I don't see a concrete statement either way in
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1/#pseudo-classes-and-pseudo-elements
> but am happy to go with David's assessment).

That is a different issue and we decided to treat as such.

</Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 17:54:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:17 GMT