Re: [css3-selectors] minor question about :not() from Daniel Glazman on 2009-03-12 (www-style@w3.org from March 2009)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:10:30 +0100
To: Andrey Mikhalev <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <49B95E26.4000205@disruptive-innovations.com>

Andrey Mikhalev wrote:
> 
> in 6.6.7:
> "The negation pseudo-class, :not(X), is a functional notation taking a 
> simple selector (excluding the negation pseudo-class itself and 
> pseudo-elements) as an argument."
> 
> so, :not(:pseudo-element) - allowed by formal grammar -
> is invalid selector or "useless" selector, as foo:not(bar) ?
> 
> 

Excerpt from section 6.6.7:

   The negation pseudo-class, :not(X), is a functional notation taking a
   simple selector (excluding the negation pseudo-class itself and
   pseudo-elements) as an argument.

</Daniel>
--
W3C CSS WG, Co-chair

Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 19:11:09 UTC