W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback

From: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:27:57 +0100
Message-ID: <2285a9d20906270727o4c14241as49f1cebcca4d12f5@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style@w3.org

2009/6/27 Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>:
>
> We have four interoperable implementations of webfonts: Gecko, Presto,
> Prince, Webkit.
>
> These implementations have followed W3C Recommendations when
> implementing web fonts,

Doesn't IE follow the web fonts W3C recommendation (albeit only for a
single DRM format)?

Received on Saturday, 27 June 2009 14:29:00 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: L. David Baron: "Re: [css3-transitions] transitions and rendering objects vs. DOM nodes"
Previous message: Giovanni Campagna: "Re: [css3-transitions] transitions and rendering objects vs. DOM nodes"
In reply to: Håkon Wium Lie: "Fonts WG Charter feedback"
Next in thread: Håkon Wium Lie: "Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback"
Reply: Håkon Wium Lie: "Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:15 GMT