On 23/06/2009, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > If site A is using site B's images against the wishes of site A, then it > will probably be broken often anyway, because when site B finds out about > it, he will change the names or locations of the files, and replace the old > ones with pictures to embarrass the content thief. People who frequent sites > that are stealing other people's intellectual property should really expect > those sites to have problems. Why does everyone think that cross-site linking must be "copyright violation" and everyone doing it must be a "content thief"? This is sickening. Doesn't anyone here use Google's "View cached version" function? -- cheers, -ambroseReceived on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 15:42:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:15 GMT