- From: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:53:30 +0200
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
2009/6/11 L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>: > On Thursday 2009-06-11 17:41 +0200, Giovanni Campagna wrote: >> 2009/6/11 L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>: >> > On Thursday 2009-06-11 16:38 +0200, Giovanni Campagna wrote: >> >> A shorter method to describe processing model 2 is "Transitions >> >> affects the Used Values, not the Computed Values. This means that >> >> values in the middle of a Transition are never inherited.". It would >> >> not break scripts anyway, because those query the CSS2.0 Computed >> >> Value (now Used Value) >> > >> > No, that's very different from processing model (2), and would break >> > transitions on inherited properties like 'color'. >> >> Why is it different? >> Step 3) in particular ensures that "inherit" on child elements has the >> value before the state change, until the end of transaction. So >> Transition does not affect the Computed Value, or actually it delays >> the propagation of CV changes to children. > > No, since the child elements will still inherit all the values over > the course of the transition, including the one from step (5). That would mean that transition progress causes the process to be reinstantiated, because it triggers a style change? > -David > > -- > L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ > Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ >
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:54:07 UTC