W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2009

Re: [CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders] Proposal for combining border-break and background-break

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:49:14 -0700
Message-Id: <5B1F3F73-7595-4AE6-9278-D62D5FD136B9@gmail.com>
To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jul 28, 2009, at 1:01 PM, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote:

>> I wonder if "bounding-box" can be a value for "background-clip",  
>> where it would act the same as "border-box", except in cases  
>> involving broken boxes and "box-break: each-box"? I haven't put a  
>> lot of thought into this idea yet, but it seems like it would work,  
>> be simpler than the current draft, and satisfy most or all use cases.
> Or something like:
> background-attachment: relative(<ancestor-id>);
> Yet another idea would be to have a property that established what  
> object fixed positioned backgrounds inside the container are fixed to:
> background-fixed-container: viewport | self

Not bad. So then 'self' would become the context for background:fixed  
of any of it's children, except for children that set their own   
background-fixed-container values?

A couple more values would be nice:

background-fixed-container: viewport | self | parent | block- 
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 20:50:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:27 UTC