W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [css3-fonts] new editor's draft

From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:40:17 -0800 (PST)
To: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5836979.6256751232548817526.JavaMail.root@cm-mail01.mozilla.org>

> I'd suggest that for TrueType/OpenType fonts, the PostScript name (ID
> = 6) is probably the best choice. Unlike the Full name, this is not
> subject to localization, and it should be equally adequate to uniquely
> identify a particular font on the system. (That's not guaranteed, of
> course, but if the user has conflicting fonts installed locally, I
> don't think that's our problem here.)

I agree that relying on Postscript names would be best.  But I don't
think there's good support for Postscript name lookups across all
platforms (e.g. Windows GDI).  

I could be wrong about this but aren't Postscript names
technically optional?  I'm sure most fonts have them these days but that
may not be true for older TrueType fonts.
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2009 14:41:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:23 UTC