- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:17:31 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > > > Actually this wouldn’t handle the target scenario of never scaling an > image on client. Being a perfectionist photographer who wants to make I would have thought that a perfectionist photographer would have wanted to go back to the original concept of HTML, namely as a framework for navigating to resources, and serve the image without any HTML wrapper. > sure any image scaling is done by the most advanced software, I would > still be forced to write script that makes sure image size in device > pixels is the perfect match to intrinsic size. > -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 08:18:35 UTC