W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [css3-values] new editor's draft (and [css3-box])

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:17:31 +0000
Message-ID: <4975889B.8040907@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Alex Mogilevsky wrote:
> 
> 
> Actually this wouldn’t handle the target scenario of never scaling an 
> image on client. Being a perfectionist photographer who wants to make 

I would have thought that a perfectionist photographer would have wanted 
to go back to the original concept of HTML, namely as a framework for 
navigating to resources, and serve the image without any HTML wrapper.

> sure any image scaling is done by the most advanced software, I would 
> still be forced to write script that makes sure image size in device 
> pixels is the perfect match to intrinsic size.
> 


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 08:18:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:15 GMT