On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Dean Jackson wrote: > Just to make sure we are all thinking the same thing. In the > following example: > > transition-property: border; > transition-duration: 1s; > > If I now apply a style rule "border-top-width: 2px", do you expect > to see a transition? Only if the top border wasn't already 2 pixels wide. :-) The key is really that shorthands are to make writing the same thing multiple times unnecessary, not to serve as some sort of pseudo- property that functions *only* as a standalone pseudo-property and nothing else. > <transition-property> || <transition-duration>[ / <transition-delay>]? > || <transition-timing-function> [, [<transition-property> || > <transition-duration>[ / <transition-delay>]? || > <transition-timing-function>]]* > > e.g. transition: color 2s/1s; > > This would have a 2 second duration with a 1 second delay. I like that syntax, makes perfect sense to me precisely because of the familiarity from font: - FarukReceived on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 20:07:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:15 GMT