- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:16:06 -0600
- To: "Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com>
- Cc: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, "Mikko Rantalainen" <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote: > Also sprach Tab Atkins Jr.: > > > Shifting the discussion a moment... > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote: > > > I'm still working on this draft -- adding gr and fr units and such. > > > The draft will be announced on this list when it's ready for review. > > > > Are there any plans to stabilize the name of the flex unit across all > > CSS modules? You use "fr" (short for 'fraction'), and I know the Grid > > Positioning and Template Layout modules use "*". There's also an > > argument for using "fl" (short for 'flexible'), though I don't believe > > that usage is attested in any current modules. > > CSS Grid Positioning Module Level 3 uses 'fr': > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-grid/ > > as does GCPM > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/ Ah, Grid Positioning changed since I last read it. That lends inertial weight to sticking with fr then. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 16:16:42 UTC