W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2009

Re: stability of root em unit spec

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:16:06 -0600
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0901070816t5eb1bb05o49956d0f49b592d@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com>
Cc: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, "Mikko Rantalainen" <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, www-style@w3.org

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:
> Also sprach Tab Atkins Jr.:
>
>  > Shifting the discussion a moment...
>  > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:
>  > > I'm still working on this draft -- adding gr and fr units and such.
>  > > The draft will be announced on this list when it's ready for review.
>  >
>  > Are there any plans to stabilize the name of the flex unit across all
>  > CSS modules?  You use "fr" (short for 'fraction'), and I know the Grid
>  > Positioning and Template Layout modules use "*".  There's also an
>  > argument for using "fl" (short for 'flexible'), though I don't believe
>  > that usage is attested in any current modules.
>
> CSS Grid Positioning Module Level 3 uses 'fr':
>
>  http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-grid/
>
> as does GCPM
>
>  http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/

Ah, Grid Positioning changed since I last read it.  That lends
inertial weight to sticking with fr then.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 16:16:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:15 GMT