W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Comments on CSS Transitions

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:44:26 +1100
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090228014426.GD13533@arc.mcc.id.au>
Boris Zbarsky:
> Sort of. It's a bit weird, because it actually does change the
> specified and computed value as it animates. Last I checked, the
> fit between the model as sort-of described in SMIL and the way
> CSS actually works was pretty poor. It was causing us some major
> implementation headaches.

IIRC in Batik I implemented getting of underlying CSS values by removing
the animated property from the override style sheet, getting the
computed value, then re-adding the property to the override style sheet.
So I’d agree, the model’s not perfect.

I wonder if other implementations ignore that and just do something
special in the cascade instead of messing with the override style?

Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:45:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:24 UTC