[CSSWG] Resolutions 2009-02-25

Summary:

   - Discussed parsing garbage (stuff that doesn't parse as either an @rule or
     as a rule set) and when it should cause @import to be ignored. General
     agreement that anything that parses as an @rule but is either a) allowed
     before @import or b) invalid and therefore ignored can appear before an
     @import rule without blocking the @import. Any other syntactic garbage
     causes the @import rule to be dropped (as it may be a future, valid
     selector or somesuch). Sylvain to write up an exact proposal.

   - Discussed CSS2.1 Issue 24 and Bert's email
       http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-24
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0509.html
     There is agreement that braces must be matched when parsing a statement
     or declaration, and that an invalid token causes the enclosing
     declaration (if we're inside a declaration) or the statement (if we're
     not) to be ignored. Bert to write up wording to clarify this.

Full minutes at
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Feb/0631.html

~fantasai