W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [css3-background] fallback color on background-image

From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:30:06 -0600
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <8AFA896F-C1D3-4E01-AA3F-34DC827CFE6B@apple.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
On Feb 20, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Brad Kemper wrote:

> On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Brad Kemper wrote:
>>> On Feb 20, 2009, at 10:27 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
>>> I agree that it is not particularly useful to have a fallback for
>>> background-color. Ever for rgbs colors, a UA that doesn't support it
>>> seems unlikely to support the newer fallback format.
>> This kind of underscores my point about the syntax being unobvious --
>> because as I understand it, the proposal _isn't_ about offering a  
>> fallback
>> for the _colour_, but about offering a fallback for when the  
>> _image_ isn't
>> available, in the case where the author desires to only have a  
>> background
>> colour when the image is absent, because normally the image would  
>> set the
>> background colour and it just happens to be transparent in some  
>> parts.
>> ...which is so complicated to explain that I agree with hyatt about  
>> just
>> removing it. I don't expect people to even _understand_ how to use  
>> it.
> Yes, I types that without recalling the syntax correctly, or looking  
> it up. It is completely nonobvious. If it is a fallback for url, it  
> should be grouped with URL more, instead of with bg color. Too bad  
> we can't use commas to specify fallback images, the way we do for  
> font-family. Because then you could just list several different  
> files, starting with an svg perhaps and ending with a color if none  
> of the files loaded or were in an unsupported format. But that would  
> require a different way to do multiple backgrounds, such as with a  
> plus sign or pipe instead of a comma.

This should just be cut from the draft.
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 23:31:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:24 UTC