W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

SV: Why "color"

From: Roland Eriksson <jrexon@newsguy.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:07:41 +0100
To: "'marbux'" <marbux@gmail.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001001c992de$7cb91870$0700a8c0@FWPixmill2>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: www-style-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] För marbux
> Skickat: den 19 februari 2009 22:31
> Till: www-style@w3.org
> Ämne: Re: Why "color"
> 
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Roland Eriksson 
> <jrexon@newsguy.com> wrote:
> 
> > Guys, stop this worm on 'color' which is actually pestering 
> my mailbox.
> 
> You apparently missed that the conversation (correctly in my mind)
> evolved to the more general issue of limitations to a single human
> language for markup tokens.

And that has to do just so much with the spelling of one single word that happens to be fully established in CSS since way back ?

> >It has been spellt COLOR for over 10 years; give it up and 
> concentrate
> > your energy on something that could be experienced as really useful.
> 
> Does not validate:
> 
> -- spellt --> spelt

I thank you so very much for that essential correction.
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 15:01:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:16 GMT