- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:12:13 -0600
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, robert@ocallahan.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > So here is how I would rate the choices: > > 1/2 star: drawing a box-shadow that follows border lines/curves that you > don't even plan to display > > 4 stars: box-shadow used the border-image as a mask (if the issue of > transparency can be dealt with in a fairly reasonable way) > > 5 stars: let the artist creating the raster border images also create the > raster shadows, and suppress the border-box-following box-shadow in the same > way that the padding-box-following borders are suppressed. I'm with David, and would rate using border-image as a mask on box-shadow higher. The reasons you've provided against this are at this point *so* niche that I'm comfortable dropping fallback support in those cases in favor of making the common cases better. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 20:12:48 UTC