W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Unicode Normalization thread should slow down; summary needed

From: Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:10:17 -0500
Message-ID: <af2cae770902110610i17461ccamdaad04c0fd6908c3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, public-i18n-core@w3.org, W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>

\2009/2/11 Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:12:55 +0100, Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Pardon my ignorance too, but this is complete news to me. As far as I
>> can tell the discussion was not "revolved around" input methods at
>> all. IME was part of the discussion, but in no way was the focus.
> As far as I can tell Henri is right. The reason the i18n WG wants this
> solved on the user agent side is because the authoring side is inconsistent
> in chosing a particular Unicode Normalization Form.

But "user agent" does not equal "input methods".

Even if you solve the problem with input methods, you still may
encounter content that is not normalized. Even if we discount
generated content, you still have to deal with "old" content. Just
solving it in "input methods" does not solve anything.


The 'net used to be run by smart people; now many sites are run by
idiots. So SAD... (Sites that do spam filtering on mails sent to the
abuse contact need to be cut off the net...)
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 14:10:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:24 UTC