W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [css21] @import parsing

From: Andrey Mikhalev <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:30:56 +0300 (MSK)
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0902051827510.28033@master.abisoft.spb.ru>

On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:55:18 +0100, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 2009-02-04 13:43 -0800, Peter Linss wrote:
>>> Agreed. Perhaps the text should read: "after any well-formed statement",
>>> or simply "after any statement".
>> 
>> I'm a little uncomfortable with ignoring @import after an unknown
>> @-rule.  That would mean we couldn't extend CSS with new @-rules
>> that belong before @import.  (For example, an @base rule to set the
>> base URL, like html:base or xml:base.)
>
> I think it does not really matter either way. Introducing e.g @base would 
> break things regardless. In fact, if the @import is not dropped it might very 
> well lead to a bunch of 404s in legacy clients.
>

hmm... what about introducing
http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/specs/constants/ ?

>
>
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 15:31:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:16 GMT