- From: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:43:08 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
Agreed. Perhaps the text should read: "after any well-formed
statement", or simply "after any statement".
Peter
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
>
> Also sprach Anne van Kesteren:
>
>> One of the tests Microsoft has is testing this:
>>
>> 1am { so:awesome }
>> @import "me";
>>
>> It expects "me" to be loaded.
>>
>> CSS 2.1 4.1.5 says: "CSS 2.1 user agents must ignore any '@import'
>> rule
>> that occurs inside a block or after any valid statement other than an
>> @charset or an @import rule."
>>
>> "1am { so:awesome }" is a valid statement per the CSS core syntax.
>> However, it is also not valid CSS 2.1. The text should be clarified
>> in
>> some way since implementors ended up doing different things.
>
> I'd argue that we should not import in this case. If we do import,
> extensions in the syntax may change the behavior of imports; in this
> case, the import will stop working once "1am { so:awesome }" becomes
> legal CSS syntax.
>
> -h&kon
> Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
> howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
>
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 21:43:53 UTC