- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:31:56 -0600
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:43 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: >> (2) jump to the point in the timing function (at the specified >> transition-duration) for the reverse transition that would have >> the element at its current position (and thus ignore >> transition-delay entirely) > > I tried implementing this, and it also looked horrible (due to > unexpected jumpiness). I'm curious about this. Can you describe the jumpiness? It doesn't seem like anything should jump at all; is it that perhaps the element changes velocity (not counting the reversal itself) in a possibly discontinuous manner? That is, with a transition that is ease-in both ways, if you reversed it near the beginning of the transition it would change from transitioning quickly (the start of an ease-in transition) to transitioning slowly in reverse (the end of an ease-in transition). ~TJ
Received on Monday, 28 December 2009 19:32:23 UTC