W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-08-12

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:26:03 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0908141526l264f2a2bsd5ee4a46feae9f87@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Brad Kemper<brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 2:35 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Brad Kemper<brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:44 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> How about a new property, border-overlay, that just stretches a border to
>>>
>>> the border box, and shows the part that intersects with the border. Done,
>>>
>>> end of definition. ;)
>>>
>>> Or 'border-background' that does everything that background does (except
>>>
>>> background-clip), but just within the border?
>>>
>>> You can do that currently by specifying multiple backgrounds, with the
>>> first set to border-box and the second set to padding-box.
>>>
>>> Good point. The fallback isn't as nice, but probably good enough.
>>
>> Remember, you can always specify your single background first, then
>> put the multiple backgrounds later.  Old UA's'll just discard the
>> latter.
>
> I know. I meant a border fallback.

Oh, gotcha.  Yeah, that's not quite as good.

~TJ
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 22:26:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:20 GMT