W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-08-12

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:02:16 -0700
Message-ID: <4A85D0D8.9060102@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
Brad Kemper wrote:
> 
> 
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:02 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>>> One other thing...
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:40 AM, fantasai 
>>> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>     * sgalineau can definitely see gradients used for border-image
>>> I can't, really, at least not as-is. Nor do I see them as being 
>>> useful for 'list-style-image', 'cursor' or 'content'.
>>> Orthogonality is cool, but actual use-cases beyond 'background' seem 
>>> pretty thin. If we have trouble specifying the behaviour of gradients 
>>> for those other properties (because there's no natural size to use 
>>> for the gradient, perhaps), I think we could just disallow them.
>>
>> Sounds like a case for making <gradient> separate from <image>.
> 
> I'd rather see clarification in those other specs for what happens when 
> when images have no intrinsic dimensions.

We already have those for CSS2.1. If they're missing anywhere else,
let me know and I'll file issues.

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 21:02:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:20 GMT