W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-08-12

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:01:41 -0700
Message-Id: <3189DB5B-C771-4AF0-B2A1-93A3614BCE57@gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>


Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 13, 2009, at 4:41 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> No it's... no it's not.  I have no idea how you got this impression,
> Brad.  In that particular argument you, I, and ROC were all talking
> about the function vs property angle, not the functional-colorstops vs
> simpler-colorstops.

It may have been what he was talking about. It wasn't what I was  
talking about. I was talking about reducing the complexity of all the  
values down to three for most common cases, and getting rid of all  
those different functional notations in the values, and combining  
radial and linear into the same set of values instead of two. I was  
proposing a sytax that worked equally well for values of a separate  
property or for an image. I was never advocating a property instead of  
a image function. 
  
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 02:02:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:20 GMT