Philip Jägenstedt said: > How about content-fit and content-position? Wrt suggestions for better names for 'image-fit' and 'image-position'. The CSS WG did consider this alternative when we brainstormed names; as I recall, this was rejected at that point because the property is not intended to generalize to all content, but rather applies only to replaced content. Since this is targeted to graphics, maybe gfx-fit, gfx-position? Or, less cryptically, graphics-fit, graphics-position? Best, MelindaReceived on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 19:46:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:13 GMT