W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2009

RE: [css3-multicol] page-break-inside and columns

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:03:41 -0700
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5D97C7EB4695104AB6345E56FE356B1941058F0653@NA-EXMSG-C125.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
>At this point I support the logic behind doing this solely through
>values, rather than properties.  My only opposition is doing it within
>the page-break-* properties, but that may be unavoidable at this point
>due to backwards compat.  I'd prefer a simple break-* set of
>properties which accepted these values.
>I would prefer we unify whether we phrase the values as allow-* or
>avoid-*.  This would that, for page-break-inside, we'd either have
>"auto | avoid-page | avoid-turn | avoid-column" (in ascending order of
>strictness) or "auto | allow-column | allow-facing | allow-none".  I
>prefer the former, as phrasing it in terms of avoiding page breaks
>seems more natural.
Yes to the naming consistency. But wouldn't the author still want to combine some of these 'flags' together e.g. 

page-break-inside: avoid-column, avoid-page;

Such multivalue expressions would of course not be backward compatible but the other options currently on the table are not either afaik.
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 00:04:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:25 UTC