W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2008

Re: [CSS2.1] Table-layout: fixed

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:10:08 -0700
Message-ID: <48DAE4F0.5050509@inkedblade.net>
To: Saloni Mira Rai <salonir@microsoft.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Saloni Mira Rai wrote:
> Hello,
> Table-layout: fixed in CSS 2.1 spec is inconsistent with all current 
> browser behavior.
> From section
> “If a subsequent row has more columns than the greater of the number 
> determined by the table-column elements and the number determined by the 
> first row, then additional columns must not be rendered. When using 
> 'table-layout: fixed', authors should not omit columns from the first row.”
> None of the browsers actually omit additional columns in tables.
> If table width is auto, all additional columns are rendered.
> If table width has a value other than auto, then additional columns are 
> rendered but space is distributed as needed.
> Therefore we propose changing the wording in the spec from
> “…then additional columns must not be rendered”
> To
> “…then additional columns may not be rendered”

We probably need to add something saying that their width and their
width's influence on the table width is undefined.

Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 01:10:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:12 GMT