Re: [page][gcpm] should a named page start on a new page?

Also sprach fantasai:

 > > I understand your resistance. I think there are two simpler option
 > > that preserves the behavior from CSS2:
 > > 
 > > 1) We can say that foo:first doesn't create a page break, but if there
 > > is an explicit page break there already, foo:first will apply.

 > I have a preference for #1.

I've edited GCPM to reflect this behavior:

  http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/Overview.html#page-lists

It seems, however, that the description of :first should go here?:

  http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#left-right-first

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome