On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: >>> >>> [1] http://lachy.id.au/dev/css/tests/adhoc/collapsing-margins-01.html > > OK, but what about this case instead. Given the same HTML, but using this > CSS instead: > > body { min-height: 50px; margin: 0; padding: 0; } > div { height: 20px; margin-bottom: 80px; } > > In this case, the height of the body would be 50px. But the height of the > div plus it's margin is 100px, so should the margin collapse through the > body element by 50px? No, I think we are again in a case when 8.3.1 excludes collapsing (used height NOT equal to what it would have been if min-height were its initial value). Indeed according to 10.7 the used height (of the body in this case) is firstly calculated ignoring min-height. This tentative value is 20px (the margin bottom of the child collapses in this step). Then min-height must be applied, and things recomputed using "the value of min-height as the computed value for height", giving as final value for the used height 50px. In this step children are ignored, since it is like we had a computed height for the parent. It is like the bottom margin of the child simply overflow the parent (but margins are not adjoining, so do not collapse). Bruno -- Bruno Fassino http://www.brunildo.org/testReceived on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 15:53:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:12 GMT