Dean Jackson: > We are interested in these features, but request changes. > > aspect-ratio and device-aspect-ratio > ------------ > > We think these should take a number (float) rather than a ratio (defined > as a string). While ratio gives the same result it doesn't seem worth > introducing a new type just for these queries. Wouldn’t that make it difficult (or impossible, since css3-values says numbers are reals rather than particular precision floats) to match some aspect ratios like 4:3? Wouldn’t the author then be forced to write something like: (min-aspect-ratio: 1.333) and (max-aspect-ratio: 1.334) ? -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 07:15:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT