> Can somebody tell me why don't w3c provide us with xml-based css format? I cannot answer that however I remember similar proposals, and at least there's been a syntactically related suggestion by Steve Heaney [1]. > It may be optional, but it would be easy to parse css using simple xml > parsers My understanding is that CSS is not hard to parse either, but what's the real benefit of having an "optional" format for CSS? [1] http://people.opera.com/howcome/2006/phd/#h-153 -- Jens Meiert http://meiert.com/en/Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 08:50:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT