W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2008

RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:44:39 -0700
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
CC: "bert@w3.org" <bert@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7C2F64B551D8664AAD94A28DAC37D020670924C5F4@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
I suppose unbiased is a relative quality. I am apparently pro-EOT enough to think that the summary does describe non-EOT positions very well, highlights issues with EOT itself and doesn’t attempt to give the final answer. In any case, biased or not, it is very much worth reading.

From: rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert O'Callahan
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:35 PM
To: Alex Mogilevsky
Cc: bert@w3.org; www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts

…
Bert is clearly pro-EOT, which is fine, but this is not some kind of "unbiased summary", which is also fine as long as people don't get misled into thinking it is.
…
Received on Friday, 17 October 2008 04:45:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT