W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2008

RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:44:39 -0700
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
CC: "bert@w3.org" <bert@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7C2F64B551D8664AAD94A28DAC37D020670924C5F4@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
I suppose unbiased is a relative quality. I am apparently pro-EOT enough to think that the summary does describe non-EOT positions very well, highlights issues with EOT itself and doesn’t attempt to give the final answer. In any case, biased or not, it is very much worth reading.

From: rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert O'Callahan
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:35 PM
To: Alex Mogilevsky
Cc: bert@w3.org; www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts

Bert is clearly pro-EOT, which is fine, but this is not some kind of "unbiased summary", which is also fine as long as people don't get misled into thinking it is.
Received on Friday, 17 October 2008 04:45:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT