Ian Hickson wrote: > I agree that it should be up to the markup specs to define which of these > state-based pseudo-classes should apply to which elements. Should we > define a set of common terms so that specs can "interface" on this issue, > or would it be better for specs to just name pseudo-classes explicitly? I don't understand. Do you mean name the existing state pseudo-classes or potentially name/define new ones? About the former, it's probably in the markup language's hands ; the latter is clearly on CSS WG's radar. </Daniel>Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 21:18:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT