- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:18:17 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>, W3C CSS <www-style@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > I agree that it should be up to the markup specs to define which of these > state-based pseudo-classes should apply to which elements. Should we > define a set of common terms so that specs can "interface" on this issue, > or would it be better for specs to just name pseudo-classes explicitly? I don't understand. Do you mean name the existing state pseudo-classes or potentially name/define new ones? About the former, it's probably in the markup language's hands ; the latter is clearly on CSS WG's radar. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 21:18:54 UTC