W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2008

Re: Selectors

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:33:04 +0200
Message-ID: <48F750A0.6020300@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

L. David Baron wrote:

> # When a=1, or a=-1, the number may be omitted from the rule. 
> This makes it sound like when a=-1, the "-1" can be omitted, whereas
> really only the "1" can be omitted, and the "-" is still required.
> It should also perhaps be clear than the optional "+" sign before a
> positive 1 need not be omitted even if the number is, so that
> :nth-child(+n+6) is valid.

AHHHHH!!!!! I did tell Elika about that one when we edited the spec
together an hour ago :-) Hey, the old monkey is sometimes right ;-)

Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 14:33:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:40 UTC