W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

[css3-layout][css3-grid] Meshing Template Layout with Grid Layout

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:31:45 -0600
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0811260731o4a804523y8580968650a680ff@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>

In the Grid Positioning Module[1] section 8.3, it is suggested that
the Advanced Layout Module[2] needs to specify how template layout
interacts with grid layout.  Since this hasn't yet been done, but I
have high hopes for both modules, I want to move this forward.

An element with template implicitly establishes a grid in a
straightforward way.  The row-heights, taken together, map directly to
a grid-rows declaration, and the same with column-widths and
grid-columns.  Example:
The template layout declaration...
  "aa" /200px
  "bc" /2em
...establishes an implicit grid equivalent to the following explicit
grid-rows: 200px 2em *;
grid-columns: 200px *;

There are two points of conflict, one in either direction.

1)  Template layout allows a row to have "intrinsic" height, where the
height is determined by the content rather than being fixed
explicitly.  Grid positioning has no concept of a grid row having
intrinsic height.  This isn't necessarily a problem (tables and
multicol elements run into the exact same issue), it just means that
the mapping isn't round-trippable; the implicit grid row has a height
equal to the computed height of the template row after layout
calculations have been performed.

2)  Grid positioning explicitly utilizes a flex unit in its grid
rows/columns declarations, with the unit name of "*".  Template layout
only brushes on this, effectively limiting you to only using 1* in
your layouts.  One can still *fake* a full flex unit just by
increasing the number of rows/columns (frex, display: "aab" * * *;
would result in the same thing as display: "ab" 2* *;), so we're not
saving any implementation complexity by forgoing the full flex unit,
so why not embrace it?  As a bonus, this may allow the use of
non-integral flexes (grid touches on this), which can again be faked
with a 1* unit, but can require very large numbers of columns/rows.

I'm not sure if it's useful or not, but the ::cell pseudo-elements can
then use grid units in their properties (border is the only one that
really pops to mind as being able to put it to use).

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2008 15:32:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:41 UTC