James Hopkins wrote: > > In this new syntax, I'm noticing that a forward slash is used as the > delimiter. However on other fallback schemes such as inserting and > replacing content with the 'content' property > (http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/#content) and 'font-family' fallback, > we're using a comma as the delimiter. > > Just for my own clarity, could someone explain to me why it's been > decided to use a forward slash as the delimiter in this instance? Comma is already used to delimit background layers. Note, there's a good chance the slash will be removed. It causes a parsing conflict in the background shorthand. ~fantasaiReceived on Saturday, 15 November 2008 03:05:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:17 GMT