W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:05:07 +0000
Message-ID: <491CB2A3.2000104@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
>  

> 
> I would just trust the UA would do what it's supposed to do (unless a
+ hacker modified Firefox, but that's a different story). I don't think we
+ can prevent this with font licensing - a hacked Firefox version would
+ still be seen as Firefox, licensing restrictions won't help.

There is a hint in the above that "hacking" has negative connotations. 
In the open sources world, creating variants is called "forking" and the 
ability to do so is considered a desirable feature by people like the 
Free Software Foundation.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 23:06:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:17 GMT