W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:26:29 +0000
Message-ID: <491C7155.40506@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

With respect, "Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>"
didn't write any of the text cited at all ...  Of course,
I'm not accusing anyone of plagiarism, you understand :-)))

Dave Crossland wrote:
> 2008/11/13 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, I mean it quite literally.  Our level of happiness would be strictly
>>>> increased by allowing only free font linking, because right now we have *no*
>>>> font linking.  We would be happy with this.  We would by *happier* with
>>>> commercial fonts as well, but *any* font-linking is an improvement that
>>>> would make our lives better.
>> I would certainly be *more* happy if commercial
>> fonts were available as well and reasonably easy to use.  But some fonts are
>> better than no fonts,
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 18:27:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:17 GMT