W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:47:53 +0000
Message-ID: <491C5A39.5040601@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@adobe.com>, Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> No, I mean it quite literally.  Our level of happiness would be strictly 
> increased by allowing only free font linking, because right now we have 
> *no* font linking.  We would be happy with this.  We would by *happier* 
> with commercial fonts as well, but *any* font-linking is an improvement 
> that would make our lives better.
> If you have no cake, then a bite of cake makes you happy (if you prefer 
> relative terms, "happier than before").  A whole slice would be better, 
> but that bite is still better than no cake at all.

That still begs the question "who is 'we'" ?
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 16:48:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:41 UTC